- Storm states that over the last year, the player credit gain from tier 8 premium tanks increased, since Wargaming (several times) improved the tier 8 premium tank money making ability - map Stalingrad is currently in development - Havok implementation will not bring effects such as camo net appearance on the tank, it will bring nice looking object destruction and dynamic equipment on tank (SS: as in fuel cans, tools etc.) that’s hanging, moving and can be ripped off by explosions - developers will definitely continue to develop the 0.9.1 test “Hellcat” sounds - nothing is known of the FV217 TD/SPG according to Cannoneer - 9.3 will bring Hellcat nerf - the reason why WG implemented FV215b instead of having Chieftain from the start was that when the British tree was introduced, the Chieftain was considered to be too modern. After that, they sent people to measure the armor (SS: in Bovington) and found out that it’s not actually as fearsome as it was thought before. - Centurion Mk.10 can’t be British tier 10 – its armor upgrade is already in the tier 9 Centurion 7/1 (the “/1″ part specifically signifies the armor upgrade) - Ruinberg on fire lighting ugly and reducing performance? “How terrible” - top light tank economy (income vs repair cost) will not be buffed - T49 will not be nerfed in 9.3 - quality of armor (depending on material) coefficient will not be implemented - Vickers MBT with Mk.3 turret? Storm: “I don’t yet” - reducing the gun aim time for most tanks to make battles more filled with action? “That would reduce the role of armor in the game even more”, Storm adds that compensating it with reduced normalization is not a solution either, as it is near zero anyway as it is - Wargaming cooperating with modmakers? “Why? We can make such features too” - Tundra map will not be removed from the game - 25 percent RNG will not be reduced - a player proposes that tier 10 tank destroyers could have their penetration nerfed from 300+ to 270-280 and compensated that with increased accuracy, Storm states this will not happen - Type 4 Chi-To stock and elite turret identical? “One is cast, the other is welded. Look here. The top one has depression of -10, stock one of -6,5″ - too many 3-4 HT5 vs 3-4 MT5 battles on tier 5? “Coincidence” - historical battles will not return soon - Q: “How do developers regard “german-lover” players (wehraboos) who play only German tanks?” A: “Not in any special way. Players are players.” - “Soviet tank only” and “German tank only” clans will not be supported in any special way - WG will not do anything about statpadders and sealclubbers (SS: “pedobears” in Russian) - the option for crews to remember previous tanks will not be implemented, not even for gold - Q: “What branches will there be?” A: “Lime-tree branches. And some birch ones.” - Q: “What do you think of Stronghold mode?” A: “Nice feature for clans.” - the fact itself that a vehicle is very common in battles that does not make a reason for rebalance (SS: but it is a good indicator of a vehicle to watch) - it’s possible that new British TD’s will come this year (SS: as a part of the Firefly branch) - Q: “Will the players be able to put various stuff on their tank as extra armor plates, boxes and stuff?” A: “Very distant future” - Q: “How are you planning to nerf Chaffee in 9.3?” A: “We will remove its wheels and gun” - credit/XP penalties for losing will not be removed (SS: yes, someone actually asks that) - for now, nothing will be done about gold shells for credits - significant changes if armor when T-62A gets reworked to HD? “I am not sure that we have such detailed armor schematics for T-62A turret” - it’s possible that the “Chinese Wall” map (available currently on Chinese server only) will return, but “it depends on player opinion” (SS: not sure how they want to collect player opinion on a map that’s not in the game)

More...