- Jagdpanzer E-100 will not be switched for “something real” – and there is no incentive to do so, the vehicle is fine - various branches (SS: specifically German TD’s mentioned) will not be reworked in order to have all the vehicles in them with the same playstyle (SS: basically, the player wants to switch the TD’s around so the entire branches get a specific “character” – this will not happen, with existing branches anyway) - T30 will not be “returned” to the heavy tank branch - KV-4 will not lose its unhistorical top gun - why was LT buff done the way it was in 9.6? “No comment” - tier 8-10 penetrantion nerf of some vehicles was not yet decided (it’s not clear how WG will do it) - the historicity of gun penetration is less important than the importance of the gun (vehicle) being balance gameplay-wise - damaging external modules does not count as damage done in battle, only damaging the main tank hitpoints does - IS-7 has historical armor, E-100 didn’t have a turret in real life and that’s why the turret thickness can be balanced however WG wants, Maus armor is based on research of Yuri Pasholok, who said that the values could be different and 200+ - the FV215b (183) armor buff in 0.9.5 is “based on historicity” (SS: wut?) - Storm states that a player proposal to reduce scout tank hitpoints while compensating that with improving other characteristics (camo, mobility) would only result in unrealistic (“UFO”) tanks - the replacement for WT E-100 is not the twin 128mm “Flakzwilling” mount WT - not only the Waffenträger line has balance problems, the earlier considered “Sturm” TD line (Brummbär and Sturmtiger) has them as well

More...